Action-timing problem with sequential Bayesian belief revision process
نویسندگان
چکیده
We consider the problem of deciding the best action time when observations are made sequentially. Specifically we address a special type of optimal stopping problem where observations are made from state-contingent distributions and there exists uncertainty on the state. In this paper, the decision-maker's belief on state is revised sequentially based on the previous observations. By using the independence property of the observations from a given distribution, the sequential Bayesian belief revision process is represented as a simple recursive form. The methodology developed in this paper provides a new theoretical framework for addressing the uncertainty on state in the action-timing problem context. By conducting a simulation analysis, we demonstrate the value of applying Bayesian strategy which uses sequential belief revision process. In addition, we evaluate the value of perfect information to gain more insight on the effects of using Bayesian strategy in the problem. © 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
منابع مشابه
AGM-consistency and perfect Bayesian equilibrium. Part I: definition and properties
We provide a general notion of perfect Bayesian equilibrium which can be applied to arbitrary extensive-form games and is intermediate between subgame-perfect equilibrium and sequential equilibrium. The essential ingredient of the proposed definition is the qualitative notion of AGM-consistency, which has an epistemic justification based on the theory of belief revision introduced by Alchourrón...
متن کاملNon Bayesian Conditioning and Deconditioning
In this paper, we present a Non-Bayesian conditioning rule for belief revision. This rule is truly Non-Bayesian in the sense that it doesn’t satisfy the common adopted principle that when a prior belief is Bayesian, after conditioning by X, Bel(X|X) must be equal to one. Our new conditioning rule for belief revision is based on the proportional conflict redistribution rule of combination develo...
متن کاملAGM-consistency and perfect Bayesian equilibrium. Part II: from PBE to sequential equilibrium
In [6] a general notion of perfect Bayesian equilibrium (PBE) for extensive-form games was introduced and shown to be intermediate between subgame-perfect equilibrium and sequential equilibrium. Besides sequential rationality, the ingredients of the proposed notion are (1) the existence of a plausibility order on the set of histories that rationalizes the given assessment and (2) the notion of ...
متن کاملCognitive Style and Auditor's judgment: Does Cognitive Style mitigate the Impact of recency bias on the auditors’ belief revision process?
Abstract: The purpose of the present study is two-dimensional. First, provide more evidence of the effects of information order on auditors' beliefs, and secondly, examine whether auditors vary their beliefs in different cognitive styles. These goals were achieved through the use of experienced professional auditors. To determine the effects of information sequence, Hogarth and Einhorn’s belie...
متن کاملEvaluating Ambiguous Random Variables and Updating by Proxy
We introduce a new theory of belief revision under ambiguity. It is recursive (random variables are evaluated by backward induction) and consequentialist (the conditional expectation of any random variable depends only on the values the random variable attains on the conditioning event). Agents experience no change in preferences but may not be indifferent to the timing of resolution of uncerta...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- European Journal of Operational Research
دوره 105 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1998